The juror

I have sustained some of the most appalling trials of this century. Over me I have felt distress, bleakness, sorrow. However none of Them were as smashing as Annie's. Have you ever heard about Annie? Oh yes Annie Laird, one of the most kind jurors I have ever Met. In George Dawes Greens The Juror, He sumarized the events And, thoroughly explained the pain and anguish Annie had to go Through. The woe in which her life revolved after mentioning those Lousy words ¨I need a little excitement in my life ¨1, well, if Annie Needed to add a touch of excitement to her life she should have tried Disneyland not jury duty. What I am about to air is what happened in Our little run with the mob.

Truly that has a bit of foul humor because I Can't run. If you keep on reading you will understand the risks of Serving for jury duty ¨Who will protect you?¨2 Before I met her, Annie was an unadorned artiste who had just Transferred out of Manhattan and into the country. To a small cottage By a lake. Her child, Oliver, who loved to ride his bike, moved in as Well. I have to say that when I met Annie for the first time it was as Juror N° 224. She was a sparkling maid. Who would have thought a Rotten soul such as the teacher would try to harm her? I confess that Her recoil in the following days impressed me. This time the trial was Against Louie Boffano. He was the head of the mob. He and his right Hand The Teacher were as bad as they come. The case was the Murders of Salvadore Riggio and his grandson. Mr. Boffano was Being accused of ordering them. By this time Annie and I already Knew the teacher, but we acknowledged him as Zach Lyde. He had a Very piquant approach toward Annie; he bought three of her artworks For twelve thousand dollars each. Nevertheless, how were we to Imagine that he was part of the mob? By the time that night had Come, Zach Lyde was having dinner at Annie's house. Oliver stayed At a friend's house; Juliet's house. Then came those frightful words From the teacher ¨Annie, listen to me now, you're in danger and Your son is in danger¨3 After this, disaster struck Annie's life. From This moment on Annie would feel disquietude and distress. Her House was bugged, her friend's house was bugged, and she could Not tell anyone.

All she had to do was to induce the other jurors to say Just two words: ¨not guilty¨4 Annie's life was miserable; whomever she told would be put in Grievous peril. The teacher was listening in, on everything they were Saying. During the trial Annie tried everything to drop out of it. However who could she talk to? Even the judge could be on their Side. The teacher often made his point clear to Annie. He would Usually kill someone to show her she would be next if she slipped. Annie implemented all her swaying powers to manipulate the jury. At The end, and I heard it clearly, came these exact words: ¨As to count one in the indictment, murder in the second degree, Do you find the defendant guilty or not Guilty? Not Guilty ¨5 Well now the trial was over, but Zach wasn't altogether ready to Let Annie go. After Slavko Czernyk, the detective engaged in the Follow-up of the teacher, had died, it came to the authorities that Something wrong was going on. This became Annie's opportunity. She spoke to Zach and during their conversation she taped him Saying ¨I might discard old Louie¨6 She subsequently took it to Boffano, who was bloody mad about the subject and wanted the Teacher killed. Wrong idea Annie; what were you thinking? The Teacher got word of Annie's betrayal and blew up Boffano's car, killing Him and his associates. He also murdered Juliet and made it look like Suicide. Annie just then understood where he was going next; he was After Oliver. But how could he get to Oliver if he was in Guatemala, Where she took him for his own safety. Then a call; told her that the Teacher knew her son was in Guatemala; she had to save him. The Chase was on... It was a long chase involving planes, cars and about ten dead People. At last the teacher had done it; he had found Oliver. Though Annie strived to get there first, it was he who had done it. At least that Was what he thought. As intelligent as he was, he never imagined that Annie would be there, waiting for him.

When the teacher was about to Shoot Oliver, Annie ¨came out of the dark, like she was made of it ¨7 and shot him to death. I must go now. It is time to start a new trial, meet a new juror, and Live a new adventure. I must say before I go that I am very happy to Have met Annie, and to have carried her on top of me. For those of You who don't know who I am, you just might be sitting on me right Now. Last Wave - Peter Weir dir In the film, The Last Wave, the director is trying to communicate the idea of a Culture within a culture or sub culture. The dominant culture in the film is the white Members of society living in Australia. The subculture in the film is the Aborigines who Were natives to the land before the white people settled in Australia. The natives Sustained their cultural beliefs and ideologies while living in largely populated cities. The dominant white culture imposes their laws, ideas of societal values and moral Beliefs on the native Aborigines. Forcing them to abide by a different law system and Way of life than what their peoples have practiced for hundreds of years. In the movie The lawyer, David, represents the dominant culture to the Aborigines because he Represents the law that is controlling their fate in the white culture. The director is also giving us many symbols or visual communication such as the Consistency of water in the film as well as, the overbearing control of darkness. The film Is shot in shadows and overall is very dark, almost forcing us to look beyond the obvious Plot and storyline and into the meaning or what the film/director is trying to tell us. The Darkness in the film can be seen as unconsciousness. It can also be seen as a prediction Of the darkness that will occur in the world when the last wave comes. The last wave Meaning a giant tidal wave that will cover the earth, killing humanity. This idea is Similar to the Christian belief in the flood that was sent down centuries ago to destroy all The evil in the world. Also, all the modern aspects of the movie (courtroom, David's Office..etc) are filmed in light. While, all of the Aborigines' scenes are filmed in darkness Or shadows. Giving me the impression of something mysterious or not understood by the Whites concerning the Aborigines. The fact that all the modern scenes are filmed in light Can also support the idea of the white culture being the predominate culture in the film But yet not dominant enough to take away the shadows(mysterious, mystical)aspect of The Aborigines. The lawyer, David, Also goes through a series of dreams and premonitions. This Is stressing the idea of mind power and mystical strength that the Aborigines have.

In That way they can be seen as the dominant culture. David is stuck between two worlds. The world he knows and understands and the other world that he is definitely a part of But does not understand. As he tries to grapple with the idea that he may be linked to the Aborigines, his own cultural beliefs are changing. He is forming a complex view on life, A combination of ways of viewing the world by both the white Christians and the Aborigines. The dream sequences in the film are sometimes difficult to distinguish from the Warped reality that is being portrayed. Overall, they do give us a chance to think and Attempt to comprehend what is going through the mind of David. For he cannot Distinguish at times what is real and not real. But what is real depends on if you perceive It as real as an individual. To me, the film is saying that their is a definite cultural conflict between the Christians and the Aborigines living in Australia. Whichever one the viewer perceives as Being dominant or subdominant, he will perceive the fact that their is a culture clash. The viewer may also see the idea that the Aborigines(tribal) are not understood in white Society and David is the only one who can. He is the link between the two worlds, and at The same time he is the wall separating them. Overall, I feel the film was good concerning the ideas behind the storyline. But Due in part to the director's fetish for water and darkness, he almost destroys the storyline To me. And without the storyline, you cannot interpret the film in a well structured way. Also, the symbolism is so predominant, it points at the viewers lack of intelligence. Similar to someone repeating themselves while speaking over and over and over and Over, merely to stress a point. Too bad by that time the point is beyond stressed it is Almost destroyed completely.

SOC 118 'The Last Wave'-Peter Weir dir. (1977)

In the film, The Last Wave, the director is trying to communicate the idea of a Culture within a culture or sub culture. The dominant culture in the film is the white Members of society living in Australia. The subculture in the film is the Aborigines who Were natives to the land before the white people settled in Australia. The natives Sustained their cultural beliefs and ideologies while living in largely populated cities. The dominant white culture imposes their laws, ideas of societal values and moral Beliefs on the native Aborigines. Forcing them to abide by a different law system and Way of life than what their peoples have practiced for hundreds of years. In the movie The lawyer, David, represents the dominant culture to the Aborigines because he Represents the law that is controlling their fate in the white culture. The director is also giving us many symbols or visual communication such as the Consistency of water in the film as well as, the overbearing control of darkness. The film Is shot in shadows and overall is very dark, almost forcing us to look beyond the obvious Plot and storyline and into the meaning or what the film/director is trying to tell us. The Darkness in the film can be seen as unconsciousness. It can also be seen as a prediction Of the darkness that will occur in the world when the last wave comes.

The last wave Meaning a giant tidal wave that will cover the earth, killing humanity. This idea is Similar to the Christian belief in the flood that was sent down centuries ago to destroy all The evil in the world. Also, all the modern aspects of the movie (courtroom, David's Office..etc) are filmed in light. While, all of the Aborigines' scenes are filmed in darkness Or shadows. Giving me the impression of something mysterious or not understood by the Whites concerning the Aborigines. The fact that all the modern scenes are filmed in light Can also support the idea of the white culture being the predominate culture in the film But yet not dominant enough to take away the shadows(mysterious, mystical)aspect of The Aborigines. The lawyer, David, Also goes through a series of dreams and premonitions. This Is stressing the idea of mind power and mystical strength that the Aborigines have. In That way they can be seen as the dominant culture. David is stuck between two worlds. The world he knows and understands and the other world that he is definitely a part of But does not understand. As he tries to grapple with the idea that he may be linked to the Aborigines, his own cultural beliefs are changing. He is forming a complex view on life, A combination of ways of viewing the world by both the white Christians and the Aborigines. The dream sequences in the film are sometimes difficult to distinguish from the Warped reality that is being portrayed. Overall, they do give us a chance to think and Attempt to comprehend what is going through the mind of David. For he cannot Distinguish at times what is real and not real. But what is real depends on if you perceive It as real as an individual. To me, the film is saying that their is a definite cultural conflict between the Christians and the Aborigines living in Australia. Whichever one the viewer perceives as Being dominant or subdominant, he will perceive the fact that their is a culture clash. The viewer may also see the idea that the Aborigines(tribal) are not understood in white Society and David is the only one who can. He is the link between the two worlds, and at The same time he is the wall separating them. Overall, I feel the film was good concerning the ideas behind the storyline. But Due in part to the director's fetish for water and darkness, he almost destroys the storyline To me. And without the storyline, you cannot interpret the film in a well structured way. Also, the symbolism is so predominant, it points at the viewers lack of intelligence. Similar to someone repeating themselves while speaking over and over and over and Over, merely to stress a point. Too bad by that time the point is beyond stressed it is Almost destroyed completely. SOC 118 'The Last Wave'-Peter Weir dir.(1977) In the film, The Last Wave, the director is trying to communicate the idea of a Culture within a culture or sub culture.

The dominant culture in the film is the white Members of society living in Australia. The subculture in the film is the Aborigines who Were natives to the land before the white people settled in Australia. The natives Sustained their cultural beliefs and ideologies while living in largely populated cities. The dominant white culture imposes their laws, ideas of societal values and moral Beliefs on the native Aborigines. Forcing them to abide by a different law system and Way of life than what their peoples have practiced for hundreds of years. In the movie The lawyer, David, represents the dominant culture to the Aborigines because he Represents the law that is controlling their fate in the white culture. The director is also giving us many symbols or visual communication such as the Consistency of water in the film as well as, the overbearing control of darkness. The film Is shot in shadows and overall is very dark, almost forcing us to look beyond the obvious Plot and storyline and into the meaning or what the film/director is trying to tell us. The Darkness in the film can be seen as unconsciousness. It can also be seen as a prediction Of the darkness that will occur in the world when the last wave comes. The last wave Meaning a giant tidal wave that will cover the earth, killing humanity. This idea is Similar to the Christian belief in the flood that was sent down centuries ago to destroy all The evil in the world.




Please do not pass this sample essay as your own, otherwise you will be accused of plagiarism. Our writers can write any custom essay for you!
Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Mann Erudite – Essays on Literary Works