Presidential Election 2000: Dimples And Chads – Сustom Literature essay

Sample essay topic, essay writing: Presidential Election 2000: Dimples And Chads - 1385 words

The Bush Vs. Gore campaign was at its climax in late October of 2000.The people of the nation were casting their votes, and the two leadingcandidates were neck to neck. The tension was sky high on electionday November 7, 2000. Behold, we were to have a new president; sowe thought. Election experts have called for 'evolution' instead of a 'revolution' inchanging the way the country goes about its elections. Never in historyhas such controversy risen as in the election 2000; Bush Vs.

Gore. Election 2000 has raised 'serious concerns over the integrity of thevoting system,' Filled with demonstrations of voting machines andoversized punch-card ballots. The election was ultimately madeovercomplicated due to the counting of ballots which were now beingre-counted on a local level because of what we now call DIMPLES ANDCHADS. Dimples and Chads are funny names to be given to election ballots;but then again, what wasn't funny about this election as a whole? Election ballots are set up to be like punch-in cards. A person caststheir vote, and a hole is punched into a ballot where the space for thecandidate is provided. It seems to be easy enough. However, that wasnot the case in this presidential election

For some reason, ballots wentup the walls with malfunctions. These bogus ballots were given thenames 'Dimples and Chads'. Dimples are the given name to ballots inwhich the vote seemed to be intended but were not quite punchedthrough but sort of made to look like a 'dimple'. Chads, on the otherhand, are votes in which a part of the punched vote has gone through, but the whole thing is not punched through. It is called a chad whenthe vote is punched but still attached to the ballot in some which way. As a result of these complications in the votes, debate was broughtabout as to which votes were going to be counted and which were not. Also it arose as to who was trying or attempting to vote for who. Thus, the debate over dimples and chads began. However, experts such as Doug Lewis executive director of the ElectionCenter in Houston, Texas, said we shouldn't be too alarmed.

He saysthat the framers of the Constitution purposely designed the process tobe flawed because they didn't trust in a centralized authority. He alsosays that a perfect election is one where none of the imperfections gointo the eyes of the public. He believes that ballot design and votingequipment should be re-examined and changed so that there shouldbe more 'legal precision' about what is constituted a vote. Ultimately, the candidates, nor the nation were satisfied with the waythings were turning out. There was debate here and controversy there, surrounded by confusion and disorganization. Thus, the vote re-countsbegan. Recounts of the votes began in every state necessary.

Peoplewere sat down to examine and count every vote in question for hours, days, and weeks at a time. Governor Bush, had received 2,909,135votes, and Vice President Gore, had received 2,907,351 votes, awinning advantage of 1,784 for Governor Bush. You would figure thatBush would victoriously win. However, Vice president Gore would notbe still with this outcome. His disappointment would be backed up bythe misunderstanding of votes in the nation. I'm sure there must havebeen many recounts in several if not all states. However, things didn'theat up or get as difficult as they did in the state of Florida.

The Bush Vs. Gore campaign was at its climax in late October of 2000.The people of the nation were casting their votes, and the two leadingcandidates were neck to neck. The tension was sky high on electionday November 7, 2000. Behold, we were to have a new president; sowe thought. Election experts have called for 'evolution' instead of a 'revolution' inchanging the way the country goes about its elections. Never in historyhas such controversy risen as in the election 2000; Bush Vs. Gore. Election 2000 has raised 'serious concerns over the integrity of thevoting system,' Filled with demonstrations of voting machines andoversized punch-card ballots. The election was ultimately madeovercomplicated due to the counting of ballots which were now beingre-counted on a local level because of what we now call DIMPLES ANDCHADS. Dimples and Chads are funny names to be given to election ballots;but then again, what wasn't funny about this election as a whole? Election ballots are set up to be like punch-in cards.

A person caststheir vote, and a hole is punched into a ballot where the space for thecandidate is provided. It seems to be easy enough. However, that wasnot the case in this presidential election. For some reason, ballots wentup the walls with malfunctions. These bogus ballots were given thenames 'Dimples and Chads'. Dimples are the given name to ballots inwhich the vote seemed to be intended but were not quite punchedthrough but sort of made to look like a 'dimple'.

Chads, on the otherhand, are votes in which a part of the punched vote has gone through, but the whole thing is not punched through. It is called a chad whenthe vote is punched but still attached to the ballot in some which way. As a result of these complications in the votes, debate was broughtabout as to which votes were going to be counted and which were not. Also it arose as to who was trying or attempting to vote for who. Thus, the debate over dimples and chads began. However, experts such as Doug Lewis executive director of the ElectionCenter in Houston, Texas, said we shouldn't be too alarmed. He saysthat the framers of the Constitution purposely designed the process tobe flawed because they didn't trust in a centralized authority. He alsosays that a perfect election is one where none of the imperfections gointo the eyes of the public.

He believes that ballot design and votingequipment should be re-examined and changed so that there shouldbe more 'legal precision' about what is constituted a vote. Ultimately, the candidates, nor the nation were satisfied with the waythings were turning out. There was debate here and controversy there, surrounded by confusion and disorganization. Thus, the vote re-countsbegan. Recounts of the votes began in every state necessary. Peoplewere sat down to examine and count every vote in question for hours, days, and weeks at a time. Governor Bush, had received 2,909,135votes, and Vice President Gore, had received 2,907,351 votes, awinning advantage of 1,784 for Governor Bush. You would figure thatBush would victoriously win. However, Vice president Gore would notbe still with this outcome.

His disappointment would be backed up bythe misunderstanding of votes in the nation. I'm sure there must havebeen many recounts in several if not all states. However, things didn'tinto the eyes of the public. He believes that ballot design and votingequipment should be re-examined and changed so that there shouldbe more 'legal precision' about what is constituted a vote. Ultimately, the candidates, nor the nation were satisfied with the waythings were turning out. There was debate here and controversy there, surrounded by confusion and disorganization. Thus, the vote re-countsbegan.

Recounts of the votes began in every state necessary. Peoplewere sat down to examine and count every vote in question for hours, days, and weeks at a time. Governor Bush, had received 2,909,135votes, and Vice President Gore, had received 2,907,351 votes, awinning advantage of 1,784 for Governor Bush. You would figure thatBush would victoriously win. However, Vice president Gore would notbe still with this outcome. His disappointment would be backed up bythe misunderstanding of votes in the nation. I'm sure there must havebeen many recounts in several if not all states.

However, things didn'theat up or get as difficult as they did in the state of Florida. Ultimately, after all the appeals introduced by Vice president AlGore, and all the recounts done in Florida as well as many otherstates, It all came down to the Electoral votes of the nation, whichfavored George W. Bush. Our new president was finally officiallyannounced in January of 2001. All of the agonizing bickering among candidates and politicalparties. And all the recounting of votes among Florida and otherstates. Not to mention all the court hearings concerned with whetherdimples and chads were to be counted as votes or undervotes.

All thisresulted in the longest election process the nation has ever had toendure. What does that say about our electoral process? I believe wehave come this far with the same process for many years. Howeverchange for the better is never without consideration.

Research paper and essay writing, free essay topics, sample works Presidential Election 2000: Dimples And Chads

and much more...




Please do not pass this sample essay as your own, otherwise you will be accused of plagiarism. Our writers can write any custom essay for you!
Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Mann Erudite – Essays on Literary Works