Jurassic park the film or the novel
The novel or film Jurassic Park. Which is better? Both versions of the story are exceptionally well written, but there are major differences. The first and most significant difference is the two different themes used in the novel and the film. The novel uses a special sort of technological, mystery theme. However, the film uses the adventure theme that so many recent films these days do. Another major difference is the role and personality of the characters. Many characters in the film for example have been altered from the novel to suit the film's adventure theme. The final difference is the outcome of the story. The novel shows the raptors escaping from their pens and venturing to the mainland on board a supply ship. It is because of this the raptors can
travel 'home'. My personal opinion of the various differences in the two versions of Jurassic Park is that they have been well adjusted to suit their roles. Deeper analysis of the novel proves this.
The first difference is how the novel starts. The opening scene is that of a frightfully mutilated workman being brought into a medical clinic by military officers. The
author continually gives clues, such as obvious lies by the officers about how the man's injuries occurred, that this is not a typical attack. Soon after this incident another mysterious attack occurs. This time a young girl is bitten by an 'unknown' lizard on a Costa Rican beach along with many other infant deaths in the surrounding area. The evidence Crichton gives here is the fact that the lizard was of an unknown species and, according to witnesses, carnivorous. It also had the now impossible task of standing on its tail. Foamy, 'prehistoric' saliva was also found on the victims' bite marks. The only event in the film that resembles the novel's beginning is the grisly death of the workman. There is no mention of the 'mystery lizard' or the infant deaths. Instead, the opening scene of the movie shows the workman being dragged into a cage by a set of intensely sharp reptilian claws.
I think that the author goes into more detail with the commencement of the novel because it makes the reader think more. Instead of showing the workman being dragged to his death by the raptor and leaving nothing to contemplate, Crichton drops clues. The most important of these clues is the way the soldiers cover up the way the workman was injured and upon the death of the workman, the word 'raptor' is whispered. When the unsuspecting reader combines the two attacks, the plot of the novel begins to take form. The novel seems to take on the theme of mystery and suspense whilst the film takes on the adventure theme. This may be because a scientific-thriller sells better than an adventure novel. Obviously, this is
the major difference in terms of the plot of the two different stories.
The next difference is the personality, attitude and fate of the characters in the two versions of the story. The first major
character change is that of John Hammond, proprietor and creator of the park. In the film he is portrayed as an elderly, but loving grandfather, trying to «make every child's dream come true». He invites his two grandchildren to visit his park to treat them to an enchanting weekend. After the park's dinosaurs escape he admits defeat and escapes with the rest of the characters. However, in the novel Hammond is shown to be a greedy, hardheaded man. His grandchildren were invited to the park too, although their sole purpose was to convince the lawyers to approve his park Instead of escaping as he did in the film, his own creations were what caused his demise. This is Crichton's way of stating, I believe, that his greed was a sin. The film clearly misses this point. The reason for this is that the film doesn't want to go into to the depth that the novel does, it just wants to entertain.
There are also numerous other character differences. One such example being that of Hammond's grandchildren. Tim is about twelve years old in the novel and Lex is about nine. In the film though, the children are opposite ages as are their skills and interests. In the film Lex is twelve years old and has computer skills, in the novel she is nine and greatly immature. This rearrangement occurs I believe because in the novel, Tim is the older sibling. In the film, Lex is shown as the older, computer literate sister. This, I believe is to signify a woman's role in modern times. Another example is the death of mathematician Ian Malcolm. In the film, Malcolm escapes in much the same manner as Hammond. In the novel, a broken ankle inflicted by the escaped T-Rex was his downfall. This difference occurs I believe because of the impact that the novel is attempting to deliver. In the film, Malcolm survives due to the fact that entertainment is the theme. Families watching the film want to be entertained and happy at the end, this is clearly not the way the novel concludes.
The biggest difference between the novel and the film is in the novel the raptors escape from their pens when the power is shut down, and even worse, the island. At the end of the novel the author gives evidence that the escaped raptors had discovered a way to survive without their daily iodine dosage supplied within the park, and that a pack was travelling north to the badlands where they lived about 250 million before. The raptors manage to survive without their daily requirements by eating foods rich in iodine such as vegetables. In the film the escaped raptors simply escape, run wild and wreak havoc on the island. I think the author's message is crystal clear, «man can't control nature». This is easily discovered when the text is analysed.
From the commencement of the Crichton makes this obviously clear with the killings by the 'compy', the escape of the dinosaurs, and the death of Malcolm, Hammond and various other park employees.
The novel and film are both excellent in their own way. The film is unconditionally one of the finest films of the decade, and a breakthrough in special affect work. The actors are remarkable and the altered plot still entertains and retains audiences of all ages. The novel is also a great
book. The manner in which Crichton writes is exceptional and the mystery of the book keeps readers reading. Overall, both versions are superb in their own way, it just depends what the viewer and/or reader is looking for.
Please do not pass this sample essay as your own, otherwise you will be accused of plagiarism. Our writers can write any custom essay for you!
Jurassic Park – The Lost World The Lost World as a novel is very different from its film version. The most contrasts are found in the beginning of the story. For instance, the novel starts off with Ian Malcolm giving a detailed lecture on extinction theories at the Santa Fe Research Center. Where as, the film starts with a wealthy British The success of Michael Crichton The Success of Michael Crichton's Novels in the Media Industry One only has to look at the astonishing opening weekend of Paramount Pictures' action adventure thriller Congo which was universally panned by Critics, to be reminded of the power of the person who created the underlying Material: Jurassic Park author Michael Crichton. The film's whopping Jurassic Park – Сustom Literature essay Jurassic Park A basic description of the plot of Spielberg's Jurassic Park. 2012, 1123 words, 0 source(s). More Free Term Papers: Jurassic Park A comparative analysis of the book "Jurassic Park" by Michael Crichton to the film of the same name. Jurassic Park A comparative analysis of the book and film version of "Jurassic Park" Jurassic Park: Comparision Between Book And Movie Sample essay topic, essay writing: Jurassic Park: Comparision Between Book And Movie - 622 words
Jurassic Park: Comparision Between Book and MovieMichael Crichton, a master of suspense, has created a novel for yourimagination. This book involves prehistoric animals and plants from theJurassic era. Steven Spielberg took on this book, as a movie project to add tohis Movies Reviewed – Jurassic Park An amazing film adaptation of the best-selling novel by Michael Crichton, that revolutionized special effects in movies the way Star Wars and 2001: A Space Odyssey did. The story concerns a tropical island, that is the home to living Dinosaurs, brought back by way of DNA. The billionaire (Richard Attenborugh), who owns the island, invites
11 July 2014